Civil Rights Groups File Brief Opposing Discrimination Against Non-Citizens in the Guantanamo Bay Military Commissions

Tuesday, Nov 22, 2011

Guantanamo_court_room.jpgThe Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF) has joined civil rights groups in filing an amicus brief on Nov. 22 in the D.C. Circuit opposing the military commissions in Guantanamo Bay because they discriminate against non-citizens.

"For over a century, the United States has honored the principle that when it comes to criminal justice, non-citizens are entitled to the same rights as citizens," said Ken Kimerling, AALDEF's legal director. "Our purpose has been to protect the rights of U.S. citizens, both internationally and at home. That we are currently subjecting non-citizens to a second class system of justice is very dangerous."

Discrimination by the Guantanamo Bay Military Commissions

In 2002, President Bush issued an executive order establishing the military commissions at Guantanamo Bay for trying counterterrorism cases brought against non-citizens. U.S. citizens, on the other hand, are entitled to the benefit of either a federal criminal trial or an ordinary court martial for the same offenses.

The Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that the military commissions were illegal because they did not meet the minimum standards of fairness required by the Geneva Conventions, among other reasons. Military commissions were subsequently reinstated with certain improvements - this time by Congress - but continue to target only non-citizens. The current federal court case, United States v. Hamdan, is the first to challenge Congressionally-sanctioned military commissions.

"We are urging the Court to apply the strictest judicial scrutiny to Congress' decision to discriminate between citizens and non-citizens," said Kimerling. "Otherwise, we risk setting a precedent that will prevent us from checking Congress' power."

Why Should U.S. Citizens Be Concerned About Discrimination Against Non-Citizens?

Two of the most widespread subversions of U.S. citizens' civil rights in our history - the Japanese American incarceration and McCarthyism - began with the government discriminating against non-citizens. Laws originally targeting non-citizens led to the incarceration of over 70,000 Japanese Americans during World War II. Likewise, laws that originally restricted immigrants' rights led to the persecution of thousands of citizens during the McCarthy era.

"In both cases, the discriminatory measures that were first applied to non-citizens laid the groundwork for the government to violate the rights of U.S. citizens on an otherwise unimaginable scale," said Kimerling. "It is easy to see how the Guantanamo Bay military commissions could have the same effect."

Download the amicus brief [pdf]

For further information, please contact:

Ujala Sehgal
Communications Coordinator
212.966.5932 ex. 217


May 5: Presentation on DOJ's racial profiling of Chinese American scientists


Texas County and AALDEF settle federal voting rights lawsuit on language assistance


AALDEF exit poll results: Chinatown voters support Clinton, Trump in NY presidential primaries


March 28: Race Relations and Collaboration After the Peter Liang Case, NYC Bar Association


March 15: Panel on Human Rights, Trafficking & Economic Empowerment


AALDEF joins 325 groups urging Supreme Court to allow executive actions on immigration to proceed


March 9: Panel on Voting Rights in an Election Year for Communities of Color


AALDEF joins 80+ groups urging the Senate Judiciary Committee to take action on U.S. Supreme Court nominee


AALDEF praises NYS Board of Regents decision to remove obstacles to professional licenses for non-citizens


Feb. 27: AALDEF legal rights workshop on immigration, DACA


Asian delivery workers sue Manhattan sushi restaurant for back wages, overtime pay


Texas federal court rules that AALDEF voting rights lawsuit may proceed


AALDEF joins 220+ groups asking Supreme Court to protect Obama's immigration actions


FAQs on Asian Americans and Fisher v. UT-Austin


160+ AAPI groups file amicus briefs in support of affirmative action in Fisher v. UT-Austin