AALDEF Statement on NYC Districting Commission's Withdrawal of Proposed Map

Tuesday, Dec 4, 2012

238_NYC Council Proposed Maps.JPGThis morning, the NYC Districting Commission withdrew the proposed NYC Council redistricting plan that it submitted to the NYC Council on November 16, 2012. The Commission then unexpectedly voted on two changes to the map, an alteration to the Brooklyn districts 34 and 37, involved with the Vito Lopez controversy, and an alteration to Councilmember Dan Halloran's district (district 19) and district 20, that resulted in uniting the Mitchell-Linden community. These two changes were voted on immediately and passed by the Commission.

The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF) is concerned about the arbitrary nature of this redistricting process, which has already resulted in withdrawal of the Commission's map and two new substantive changes even before the third round of public hearings has even commenced.

AALDEF staff attorney Jerry Vattamala said, "The Commission stated that additional public input was necessary in order for the Commission to craft a well-considered plan, and we hope the Asian American community's changes will be given serious consideration." AALDEF urged that the following adjustments be made:

  • John Adams High School must be included with the community of Richmond Hill/South Ozone Park in district 28. The western boundary line of district 28 must be extended towards Woodhaven Boulevard.
  • Briarwood and Jamaica Hills must be kept whole and in the same district, as they previously were.
  • Oakland Gardens must be kept whole with the rest of Bayside in district 19.

"The Unity Map best illustrates how to accomplish all of the above and should be adopted in whole or in part," said Vattamala.

The Commission is bound by the NYC Charter, which requires that redistricting criteria be applied in a ranked order. The first priority after complying with population equality for each district is ensuring that language and racial minorities protected under the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 have fair and effective representation. The groups protected under the federal Voting Rights Act are African Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans. Representatives of these groups jointly proposed the Unity Map.

The Charter also requires that the Commission make its plan available for public inspection and comment at least one month in advance of public hearings. The third round of public hearings will take place in January and will finally allow the public an opportunity to inspect and comment on a real plan before it is resubmitted to the City Council.

"At minimum, these proposed changes must be made to the map, to illustrate that the Commission has given serious consideration to the extensive public comments already given by the Asian American community," said Vattamala.

Ujala Sehgal
212.966.5932 x.217


May 5: Presentation on DOJ's racial profiling of Chinese American scientists


Texas County and AALDEF settle federal voting rights lawsuit on language assistance


AALDEF exit poll results: Chinatown voters support Clinton, Trump in NY presidential primaries


March 28: Race Relations and Collaboration After the Peter Liang Case, NYC Bar Association


March 15: Panel on Human Rights, Trafficking & Economic Empowerment


AALDEF joins 325 groups urging Supreme Court to allow executive actions on immigration to proceed


March 9: Panel on Voting Rights in an Election Year for Communities of Color


AALDEF joins 80+ groups urging the Senate Judiciary Committee to take action on U.S. Supreme Court nominee


AALDEF praises NYS Board of Regents decision to remove obstacles to professional licenses for non-citizens


Feb. 27: AALDEF legal rights workshop on immigration, DACA


Asian delivery workers sue Manhattan sushi restaurant for back wages, overtime pay


Texas federal court rules that AALDEF voting rights lawsuit may proceed


AALDEF joins 220+ groups asking Supreme Court to protect Obama's immigration actions


FAQs on Asian Americans and Fisher v. UT-Austin


160+ AAPI groups file amicus briefs in support of affirmative action in Fisher v. UT-Austin