AALDEF joins amicus brief in challenge to revised Trump travel ban in Hawaii district court; UPDATE: 9th Cir. hearing on May 15

Wednesday, Mar 15, 2017

Today, the federal district court in Honolulu will hold a hearing at 9:30 am Hawaii time (3:30 pm ET) on the State of Hawaii's lawsuit challenging Trump's revised travel ban, which temporarily suspends U.S. refugee admissions and migrants from six Muslim-majority countries. Executive Order 13780, entitled "Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States," was issued on March 6, 2017 and takes effect on March 16 at 12:01 am, replacing the administration's earlier executive order issued on Jan. 27, 2017.  

AALDEF joined the Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality (Korematsu Center), the children of litigants in the Japanese relocation and incarceration cases from World War II, civil rights organizations, and national bar associations of color, in an amicus brief filed on March 10 in State of Hawai`i and Ismail Elshikh v. Trump et al. Pro bono counsel on the brief is Akin Gump.

This lawsuit contends that the Executive Order violates the First and Fifth Amendments, the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Religious Freedom and Restoration Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act. The State of Hawaii asserts that the travel ban will disrupt the University of Hawaii's recruitment of students and faculty, damage the state's tourism industry, and prevent Hawaii residents, such as plaintiff Ismail Elshikh, from reuniting with their relatives from the banned Muslim-majority countries.

AALDEF's amicus brief asserts that courts can and should review executive branch actions on immigration. The Justice Department's reliance on the "plenary power doctrine" to defend the new executive order is based on a string of overtly racist and outdated cases, including discredited precedents allowing the World War II incarceration of Japanese Americans by executive order. The amicus brief contends that these arguments should have been rejected then, and they have been rejected recently by the 9th Circuit and the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in orders blocking the previous Jan. 27 travel ban.

In addition to pro bono counsel Akin Gump, Hawaii counsel on the amicus brief include Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing and Eric Yamamoto of the University of Hawai`i Mānoa William S. Richardson School of Law. 

Read the amicus brief here.

UPDATE: On May 15, 2017, a 9th Circuit panel heard the government's appeal of the Hawaii district court's preliminary injunction blocking the travel ban nationwide. Our amicus brief in the 9th Circuit can be downloaded here.

*     *     *
For more information, contact:
Ken Kimerling, Legal Director
212.966.5932 x203

Margaret Fung, Executive Director
212.966.5932 x201


Preliminary results of AALDEF exit poll of more than 7,600 Asian American voters in midterm elections


AALDEF to conduct Asian American Exit Poll and monitor poll sites in 14 states


AALDEF criticizes Trump's intention to end birthright citizenship by executive order


AALDEF stands in solidarity with Pittsburgh and Louisville


Volunteers needed for AALDEF Asian American Exit Poll and to monitor polling places in 2018 elections


AALDEF denounces White House plan to redefine "public charge" for immigrants seeking green cards


Sept. 12: AALDEF legal director Ken Kimerling receives 2018 New York County Lawyers Association Public Service Award


35 Asian American groups and higher ed faculty file amicus brief in support of race-conscious admissions at Harvard


AALDEF statement on Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court


AALDEF deplores the Supreme Court's decision upholding the Muslim ban


Korean and Latino workers at Kum Gang San restaurants win enforcement of $2.7 million wage theft judgment


AALDEF opposes Trump administration's politicization of Census 2020 by adding citizenship question


2017 AALDEF exit poll: 2,538 Asian American voters polled in 4 states: VA, NJ, NY, MA


Federal appeals court upholds ruling in AALDEF case that Texas election law violates Voting Rights Act