AALDEF Commends Court-Drawn Congressional Redistricting Plan For Keeping Asian American Communities Together

Tuesday, Mar 6, 2012

Congressional1.JPGYesterday evening, Special Master Roanne Mann, the federal magistrate judge appointed to draw New York state Congressional district lines in Favors v. Cuomo, released the court's proposed Congressional redistricting plan.

"The proposed district lines are a positive development, since the court's plan largely keeps Asian American communities together," said Jerry Vattamala, staff attorney at the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF). "We are glad that the court acknowledged the voting rights concerns of New York's fast-growing Asian American community in the redistricting process."

AALDEF submitted the Unity Map, its redistricting plan to protect the voting rights of Asian Americans and other communities of color, to Special Master Mann, including detailed neighborhood maps, ethnic data, and communities of interest surveys.

In addition, AALDEF submitted formal commentary on alternative plans proposed by other civic organizations and legislative parties. At yesterday's hearing in Favors v. Cuomo, AALDEF urged the court to take into account Asian American neighborhood boundaries in New York City when drawing new district lines.

Under the Special Master's congressional redistricting proposal:

  • Proposed District 6 (Asian VAP 37.9%*) corresponds to AALDEF's Unity Map by retaining the Asian American community in Queens (in Flushing/Bayside, Elmhurst and Briarwood/Jamaica Hills) within one district.

  • Proposed District 7 (Asian VAP 19.8%) likewise adheres to the Unity Map by keeping the community of interest in Manhattan's Chinatown and Brooklyn's Sunset Park within one district.

  • Proposed District 14 (Asian VAP 16.1%) retains the Asian American community of interest in Jackson Heights and Woodside, Queens within one district.

  • Proposed District 5 (Asian VAP 11.5%) retains the Asian American community of interest in Richmond Hill/South Ozone Park within one district.

"In particular, we note the Special Master's proposal is consistent with the Eastern District's precedent of recognizing that Sunset Park and Chinatown are a single community of interest," said Vattamala. "This was first affirmed by this court in 1997 in Diaz v. Silver, then in 2002 in Rodriguez v. Pataki, and now, in 2012, in Favors v. Cuomo."

View AALDEF's federal court submission >

Download AALDEF's response to alternate submitted proposals [pdf]

*Percentages below are from the Department of Justice on Voting Age Population (VAP)

Contact:
Ujala Sehgal
212.966.5932 ex.217
646.207.1497
usehgal@aaldef.org


11.7.18

Preliminary results of AALDEF exit poll of more than 7,600 Asian American voters in midterm elections

11.6.18

AALDEF to conduct Asian American Exit Poll and monitor poll sites in 14 states

10.30.18

AALDEF criticizes Trump's intention to end birthright citizenship by executive order

10.29.18

AALDEF stands in solidarity with Pittsburgh and Louisville

10.6.18

Volunteers needed for AALDEF Asian American Exit Poll and to monitor polling places in 2018 elections

9.28.18

AALDEF denounces White House plan to redefine "public charge" for immigrants seeking green cards

9.10.18

Sept. 12: AALDEF legal director Ken Kimerling receives 2018 New York County Lawyers Association Public Service Award

8.30.18

35 Asian American groups and higher ed faculty file amicus brief in support of race-conscious admissions at Harvard

7.10.18

AALDEF statement on Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court

6.26.18

AALDEF deplores the Supreme Court's decision upholding the Muslim ban

4.23.18

Korean and Latino workers at Kum Gang San restaurants win enforcement of $2.7 million wage theft judgment

3.27.18

AALDEF opposes Trump administration's politicization of Census 2020 by adding citizenship question

12.4.17

2017 AALDEF exit poll: 2,538 Asian American voters polled in 4 states: VA, NJ, NY, MA

8.23.17

Federal appeals court upholds ruling in AALDEF case that Texas election law violates Voting Rights Act